Ship AI you trust

Risk management for agentic systems

Your experts set the bar. Your AI has to clear it. Automate the work, not the judgment — and stay in control of what ships.

The AI risk

AI adoption is outpacing risk controls

Demo success ≠ production permission. Shipping AI comes with unique failure modes traditional software never had.

The consequence

Risk owners are stuck with two bad options.

Stall the rollout

Hold the release by lack of confidence — and leave value on the table.

Ship and hope

Release it anyway and hope nothing breaks — with no evidence for what it actually does in production.

AI Risk Management

Align your AI with business outcomes.

Three core components that bring standards and rigour to shipping AI products.

Define what correct looks like

Human experts author input → output scenarios that encode business processes into pass/fail tests. Business IP becomes a compounding data asset and serves as context for any AI product.

  • Domain expertise captured as data IP
  • Compounding scenario test suite
  • Reusable context for any AI product
Define

Set release gates

Employ the scenarios to stress-test the AI. A positive outcome gives business the confidence to release, and engineers the freedom to iterate quickly.

  • Clear release evidence for business
  • Faster, safer release cycle for engineering
  • Swap prompt, model, or provider with confidence
Gate

Benchmark your AI

The release gates serve as a common yardstick to measure AI performance, quantify improvements, and compare different models and AI providers on capability and cost-effectiveness.

  • Model and provider independence
  • Business-readable performance scores
  • Iteration-over-iteration improvement tracking
Benchmark
How it runs

A scenario, end-to-end

From the expert's pen to the deployment gate — every scenario passes through the same four stages.

01
Author
What "correct" looks like
Business experts write down the scenarios — the inputs the AI will see and the answers it should give back. Hover any stage for details.
02
Test
Run the AI on every input
The agent consumes each scenario's input and returns whatever it actually produces. That output gets stamped onto the scenario card.
03
Score
Output vs. expected output
The agent's output is compared to the expert's expected output. Same answer turns the slots green; a different answer turns them red.
04
Gate
Pass / fail decides ship
Every scored scenario lands in the gauge. Passes swing the needle left; even one fail slides it right and holds the release.
Animation paused — reduced motion preference detected.
Compliance & data control

Built for regulated environments

No data leaves your perimeter. No decision goes untracked.

  1. Audit trail

    Continuous audit log

    Who did what, when? Every significant change captured continuously and automatically. Out of mind, there when you need it.

    Capture
    Continuous, append-only
    Tracks
    Ground truth, models, prompts, experiments
  2. EU AI Act evidence

    Structured for the Act

    Avoid expensive hours tracking down data. Arbitr shapes your audit logs against EU AI Act articles.

    Mapped to
    EU AI Act articles
    Output
    Structured evidence bundles
  3. Data residency

    Runs on your infrastructure

    Runs in your cloud, on your terms. Scenarios, prompts and model outputs never leave your perimeter.

    Deploys
    Customer cloud or on-prem
    Data egress
    None — source data stays in your perimeter
Research & blogs

Notes from the lab

New components, open benchmarks, and notes from our research.

New

OCR Cost Comparison

First Public Component

Stop overpaying for SoTA OCR when standard documents do not require it. Upload your document and get a provider-agnostic, business-metric comparison across cost tiers — in just two minutes. Free. No credit card. No email.

Model-provider agnostic by design.
Tap to get started
Upload and compare OCR models instantly
No sign-up required • PDF & Images • Max 2MB
Upload your document
Drag and drop or click to select a file
No sign-up required • PDF & Images • Max 2MB

Public leaderboards

Compare models and agent architectures on business-relevant performance and risk signals.

Explore leaderboards

Open evaluation framework

Our evaluation approach is transparent, auditable, and community-driven.

View on GitHub
FAQ

Common questions

What kinds of AI can Arbitr test?

Any system you can call — LLMs, agents, RAG pipelines, vision and document-extraction models, classical ML classifiers. If it has an input and an output, Arbitr can score it.

How is this different from an LLM eval tool?

Eval tools score the model. Arbitr scores the workflow against the business outcome it has to deliver — durable across model swaps, meaningful to non-technical stakeholders.

Who is Arbitr built for?

The team that owns the AI outcome — product, risk and compliance, and the engineers shipping the system. Domain experts write scenarios in business language; engineering wires the agent and the CI gate.

We have custom or fine-tuned models — does Arbitr integrate?

Yes. Arbitr calls your model through whatever endpoint you expose — hosted API, self-hosted server, or a model in your VPC. Custom prompts, fine-tunes, RAG stacks and agent frameworks all plug in the same way.

Where is our data stored?

Inside your perimeter. Arbitr deploys into your cloud or on-prem. Your scenarios, prompts, model outputs and audit logs stay on your infrastructure — nothing leaves, including to us.

How do we get started?

Get in touch — we will walk you through a pilot scoped to one of your workflows.

Audit your AI before your customers do